Showing posts with label life cycles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label life cycles. Show all posts

Summer Solstice (2) - Benchmark of Basic Nature


Through the millennia, an absolute basic symbol of human awareness to Mother Earth's systems was the longest day of our year. Consider how rudimentary the concept, and yet how neglected this building block of nature has become.  James Carroll writes a concise but sweeping piece here on the human-ness factor of the summer solstice.

Published on Monday, June 20, 2011 by the Boston Globe

A Solstice Approaches, Unnoticed


ONCE, HUMANS were intimate with the cycles of nature, and never more than on the summer solstice. Vestiges of such awareness survive in White Nights and Midnight Sun festivals in far northern climes, and in neo-pagan adaptations of Midsummer celebrations, but contemporary people take little notice of the sun reaching its far point on the horizon. Tomorrow is the longest day of the year, the official start of the summer season, the fullest of light — yet we are apt to miss this phenomenon of Earth’s axial tilt, as we miss so much of what the natural world does in our surrounds.
In recent months, catastrophic weather events have dominated headlines as rarely before — earthquakes and tsunami in Asia; volcanic cloud in Europe; massive ice melts at the poles; tornadoes, floods, and fires in America. “Records are not just broken,” an atmospheric scientist said last week, “they are smashed.” Without getting into questions of causality, and without anthropomorphizing nature, we can still take these events as nature’s cri de coeur — as the degraded environment’s grabbing of human lapels to say, “Pay attention!”

To our ancestors in the deep past, that attention to nature was, well, natural. They made the evolutionary leap into human consciousness through close observation, among other things, of what heavenly bodies do in the sky. In a cosmos over which they had no control, paying attention to patterns of heat and cold, light and dark, rain and drought was a matter of survival. The invention of agriculture depended on awareness of seasons, so that times of planting and harvesting, herding and grazing, could be depended upon. Movements of the sun and moon were seen to have both influences on, and counterparts in, individual human experience — from mood swings to menstruation to aging. Astrology opened into astronomy, calculation into mathematics, scrutiny into science. Definitions of the calendar were essential to culture. The solstice was a marker of all this.

But this habit of regard for nature was essential also to the transition into modernity. Contemplation of the sun was nothing less than the incubator of our age. Copernicus and Galileo, after all, ushered humans into the breakthrough of testable knowledge by means of their study — one theorizing, the other experimenting — of Earth’s place in the solar system. The solstice, previously perceived as the sun’s standing still for a moment before reversing course on the horizon, would never be understood that way again. Heliocentrism initiated the maturing of science, which eventually would demonstrate that seasonal rhythms not only produce global dynamics of climate but also hormonal changes — daily, weekly, monthly — within the individual human body, each person biologically synchronized to the cosmic clock. Because of science, we were able to grasp the age of the earth — to know that there have been more than 4 billion summer solstices. Humans awakened to the full complexity of the universe.

Ironically, the accompanying social revolution of industrialization led to illusions of human mastery over nature, and ultimately to detached indifference toward it. Contemporary technological civilization became blinded to key phenomena of the living world, much as the night sky is blotted out by the artificial light of cities. Most recently, the cycles of time have given way to the eternal present of the computer screen — detachment squared. As humans came to know so much, we lost our grip on the knowledge with which we became human: our familiarity with the physical universe we live in. Imagining that we no longer needed nature, we ourselves became the great threat to nature. As our sense of the complexities of life quickened and deepened, our destructiveness of life also quickened and deepened. Through ambitions of unlimited growth, consumption, competitive manufacture, and self-expanding technology, we humans have become a mechanism of extinction. When we stopped noticing Earth, we began to destroy it.

Intimate awareness of nature and its cycles, as we saw, was an ancient mode of survival. But survival is at issue again. Noticing the length of light now, reveling in the sun’s achievement, rejoicing in Earth’s perfect balance, honoring the summer solstice — loving it: This is how we became human, and it is how we stay human.

Kindergarten Life Cycle

It's so critical to understand ecological systems and cycles. We need to honor and replicate the natural world as a matter of course.  Biomimicry has become a science tending specifically to this end. Our failure to pay attention to natural systems has partially gotten us into this unsustainable quagmire. 

I visited a kindergarten class today; the kingdom of the 5-year-old.
They had a netted cage with two monarch butterfly chrysalises hanging by their little threads at the top. One chrysalis was bright green and the other a bit darker.
Monarch breeding has been the staple of life cycle wonderment for elementary children from forever. Just hunt down the milkweed plants etched with leaf chews, or send in an order to a science materials house. Voila - caterpillars.
This morning the children ran straight in after the morning bell to the chrysalis cage to check on overnight progress. Things looked pretty much the same as when they left the day before. As they explained the process to me, one kid actually used the word metamorphosis and the others very confidently used chrysalis. The vocab had been implanted in their kinder minds.

The natural shifting in life stages of this insect actually changes the shape and size and mode of locomotion of the critter as it advances to its “adult" self. What an awesome and radical natural system!
An hour later I sat near the circle of kinders with my back to the butterfly table. I turned and glanced over at the container...and a butterfly was out!  It just hung there, quietly!  Next to it was a clear and empty chrysalis. The whole thing had happened while we went about our business of the early school morning. No one had seen the probing or twisting outward and downward of the new insect. It was, simply, out. Done. Stretching its wings. We celebrated!

I felt cheated at first. How come we didn’t get to watch? Why did it have to sneak around on its own, and then just show up? No announcement. No clue. We had missed the show; the change that helps to explain this incredible natural cycle. It just...did it!

But, that's the challenge. We need to understand nature without requiring it to perform for us at will. The metamorphosis we experienced was not a circus act; a spectator sport. 
What if the monarch-in-a-cage-show within the primary classroom was only the beginning of an equally intense progression of natural system and cycle revelations? Do we continue this magnificent show?
By the end of the school day the monarch butterfly had walked its way, upside-down, across the top and appeared to sidle up to the other chrysalis:
“Helloooo? You, in there...yah, you! I’ve done it!! Remember last week?? It worked!! I got six long legs now and, I think, wings! I know you’re in there. Helloooo!?”

The Lorax: A Second Reading

Theodor Seuss Geisel.  At a young age he was involved with humor publications at Dartmouth and became a talented political cartoonist during WWII for the New York City newspaper PM.  Geisel was a strong advocate of the war and the president. He could be very biting in his satire, especially at those with isolationist sentiments.  His charicature drawings of world leaders in that day were often unflattering. One recognizes, in retrospect, some of the whimsical cartoon creatures he drew and became famous for in the world of children’s books; the Dr. Seuss we all know and love.


It was not at all unreasonable, then, that Geisel wove threads of social comment into his books of the 1950’s, ‘60’s and ‘70’s.
  
The Lorax was one of his later books. It is, seemingly, straight forward with the commentary about natural resources and commodities.  But, you know there can be distractions from this story line when reading aloud to young audiences.  Both reader and listeners get caught up anticipating the rhymes or visualizing very fictitious animals.  

“…And with great skillful skill and with great speedy speed, I took the soft tuft.  And I knitted a Thneed!”
“You’re glumping the pond where the Humming-Fish hummed!  No more can they hum, for their gills are all gummed.”

It is easy to get sidetracked from the themes when the tongue-twisted word play and wonderful Seuss-ian drawings are all so much fun.  


But, read it to them again.  


Why? Because our current 10-year-olds will need to be fully versed in precisely these themes. So many contemporary scenarios can already be explained using Seuss’s paradies. Worldwide. These scenarios (below) are scheduled to multiply and multiply as we are all forced to shirk oil and energy. We will be challenged to scale back our lives filled with “stuff” and adapt to the enveloping climate changes. The Lorax becomes more and more timely 40 years after its release.  Theodor Geisel is still pointing the way.


Cast of Themes:
       *Over-extraction of nonrenewable natural resources 
       *Pollution as a product of energy production 
       *Imbalance of ecological webs and cycles 
       *Bottom line economic growth

The Lorax Cast of Characters become metaphors for the world of our consumer culture.

Enter: Stage Right.

The Once-ler tells the whole story to a curious boy.  He recounts his enthusiasm in the development of his Thneed industry. The Once-ler is never revealed: he is a faceless exploiter; reclusive; behind the scenes; a carpetbagger. His goal? Greedy richness. AKA, continued economic growth.

The truffula trees represent a natural resource with an untapped opportunity for exploitation. They are soft and colorful and inviting. They ”smelled of butterfly milk.”  The truffulas are integral to the ecology of the land.  The last tree is cut as the biosphere of the land is disappearing.

The thneed - the product of only one part of the truffula tree - the tuft- which appears to be a nonrenewable resource. This perfect product is adaptable to many uses: "You can use it for carpets. For pillows! For sheets! Or curtains! Or covers for bicycle seats!" It really doesn’t matter, in other words, what the product is, as long as it was a product. This was also a product which, being new to the market, would be purchased by those wishing to have something unique regardless of the usefulness or how it was made or resources used. (Enter gullible public)

The thneeds are mass-produced as the truffulas are chopped down. Mechanization takes over in the forest and now multiple trees are chopped at once. Faster and faster. The original home industry model gives way to a smokestacked factory with an assembly line pace.

Thneeds are then marketed further afield, using higher transportation costs and relying on further natural resource extraction.
"I went right on biggering...selling more Thneeds. 
And I biggered my money, which everyone needs."  

Money is the end-all.  But when the last tree is cut the factory closes down. The workers simply move out of the region, leaving devestation behind.

Exit, Stage Left  


Ecological components:

Swomee-Swans: Bird and sky representatives of the story; happy and singing; affected by smoke and smog in the industrial air. They were sent off by The Lorax to survive elsewhere.
Brown Bar-ba-loots: Animal/mammal representative of the story who were sustained by truffula fruits. They became hungry when trees disappeared and were sent off by The Lorax for food elsewhere.
Humming-Fish:  Fish and water representatives of the story; happy at first; victims of water pollution from industrial sludge. ("their gills are all gummed") They were sent off by Lorax to find healthier waters elsewhere.
Lorax:  
Yes, finally, The Lorax.  He responds early in the story to the cutting of trees and continues to protest the Once-ler at every step of the manufacturing operation.  Yet, he, too, leaves in the end; banishing himself.



"I speak for the trees!"  


Who is this guy, anyway?  A political correctness? A collective global citizen consciousness? A nagging subconsciousness of industry? Mother Nature herself? The spotted owl?

The answer is linked to the one word The Lorax leaves behind: UNLESS. Unless what? Unless who? The boy! It's the curious young boy who is ready to catch the last truffula seed on Earth.  The seed is thrown down to him by the faceless establishment that had too much momentum to halt its own destruction. Hindsight consciousness. Too much economic growth; too late for sustainability.  



When Lorax was written back in 1972, it is said, Dr. Seuss was referencing the battle in the Northwest between loggers and those attempting to save habitat for the spotted owl. He was appealing then to the next generation to take the seed of preservation and plant it.  That was two generations ago. Now the stakes are so much higher. 



Philosophy For Children
The Lorax Project 
Dr. Seuss